The interpretation moved across the clinically actionable boundary since this result was reported.
2023 · On file
Uncertain significance
Reported 7 Feb 2023
Today · ClinVar
Likely pathogenic
ClinVar last evaluated 5 Dec 2025 · Reviewed by expert panel
The changed variant and every historical record that carries it. Select a record to see its detail.
Changed variant
TP53
c.589G>A
VUSLikely pathogenic
VP-10469
Not reviewed25-34 · Oncology
Since the 2023 report, the consensus for TP53 c.589G>A has moved from uncertain significance to likely pathogenic. That reading rests on 11 submissions at strong review confidence, reviewed by expert panel. That crosses the clinically actionable boundary, so management guidance issued on the original interpretation may no longer be the right guidance. 2 records on file carry this variant and have not yet been reassessed.
Composed from the structured fields of the records cited on this page. Requires clinical verification before it informs any decision.
Each source is shown as it reports itself. VariantPulse does not merge them into a single verdict.
| Source | Classification | Review level | Last updated | Strength | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClinVar11 submissions on record. | Likely pathogenic | Reviewed by expert panel | 5 Dec 2025 | Strong3 of 4 review criteria met | VCV000188060 |
| Population frequencyHighest reported allele frequency carried on the source record. | Not reported | No frequency data | 5 Dec 2025 | Reference observation | |
| LiteraturePublications linked to this variant record. | 8 indexed publications | PubMed index | Latest 2022 | Supporting context | |
| Regional Evidence IndexModelled regional aggregation maintained inside this workspace | No regional record | Not held | - | - | |
| This institutionThe interpretation issued to the patient at the time of testing. | Uncertain significance | Internal report | 7 Feb 2023 | On record |
Cited publications
TP53 c.589G>A. The DNA is unchanged. The evidence around it is not.
A triage signal for the queue. Not a clinical risk score, and not a statement about any individual.
The same records as a list, for scanning and screen readers.