The interpretation moved across the clinically actionable boundary since this result was reported.
2023 · On file
Uncertain significance
Reported 19 Jun 2023
Today · ClinVar
Pathogenic
ClinVar last evaluated 6 Jul 2026 · Reviewed by expert panel
The changed variant and every historical record that carries it. Select a record to see its detail.
Changed variant
BRCA2
c.7847C>T
VUSPathogenic
VP-10395
Not reviewed35-44 · Oncology
Since the 2023 report, the consensus for BRCA2 c.7847C>T has moved from uncertain significance to pathogenic. That reading rests on 7 submissions at strong review confidence, reviewed by expert panel. That crosses the clinically actionable boundary, so management guidance issued on the original interpretation may no longer be the right guidance. 2 records on file carry this variant and have not yet been reassessed.
Composed from the structured fields of the records cited on this page. Requires clinical verification before it informs any decision.
Each source is shown as it reports itself. VariantPulse does not merge them into a single verdict.
| Source | Classification | Review level | Last updated | Strength | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClinVar7 submissions on record. | Pathogenic | Reviewed by expert panel | 6 Jul 2026 | Strong3 of 4 review criteria met | VCV000630829 |
| Population frequencyHighest reported allele frequency carried on the source record. | 0.00e+0 | The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), exomes | 6 Jul 2026 | Reference observation | |
| LiteraturePublications linked to this variant record. | 8 indexed publications | PubMed index | Latest 2026 | Supporting context | |
| Regional Evidence IndexModelled regional aggregation maintained inside this workspace | No regional record | Not held | - | - | |
| This institutionThe interpretation issued to the patient at the time of testing. | Uncertain significance | Internal report | 19 Jun 2023 | On record |
Cited publications
BRCA2 c.7847C>T. The DNA is unchanged. The evidence around it is not.
A triage signal for the queue. Not a clinical risk score, and not a statement about any individual.
The same records as a list, for scanning and screen readers.