Regional evidence reaches a different conclusion from the global consensus.
2023 · On file
Uncertain significance
Reported 2 May 2023
Today · ClinVar
Uncertain significance
ClinVar last evaluated 3 Mar 2017 · Reviewed by expert panel
Synthetic record. No identifiers in this workspace correspond to a real person.
Reported as uncertain significance by expert-panel criteria. No change to reproductive advice at the time.
Read from ClinVar at the last evidence sync.
Global and regional evidence disagree on CFTR c.601G>A. The global consensus is uncertain significance, drawn from 21 submissions. The regional index asserts likely benign on 4 observations across a cohort of 3,030. One record on file carries this variant and has not yet been reassessed.
Composed from the structured fields of the records cited on this page. Requires clinical verification before it informs any decision.
Global · ClinVar
Uncertain significancereviewed by expert panel · Last evaluated 3 Mar 2017
Regional · Regional Evidence Index
Likely benign4 observations in 3,030 · updated 2 Mar 2026
Human review required
VUS globally, Likely benign regionally. A clinician weighs both; neither source is treated as correct.
Global
Read from ClinVar, which aggregates submissions dominated by European-ancestry cohorts.
Regional
Modelled regional aggregation maintained inside this workspace.
VariantPulse analysis
The sources place this variant in different bands without crossing the actionable boundary. In gnomAD v4 this change is about four times more frequent in the Middle Eastern reference group than globally. Higher-than-expected population frequency is a recognised line of evidence toward a benign reading, but the Middle Eastern group is only about 3,000 people, so the signal is flagged for review rather than applied automatically.
VariantPulse recommends manual review due to conflicting interpretation across evidence sources. It does not rank one source above the other.
CFTR c.601G>A. The DNA is unchanged. The evidence around it is not.