Regional evidence reaches a different conclusion from the global consensus.
2023 · On file
Pathogenic
Reported 30 Jan 2023
Today · ClinVar
Uncertain significance
ClinVar last evaluated 30 Apr 2026 · Reviewed by expert panel
Synthetic record. No identifiers in this workspace correspond to a real person.
Reported as pathogenic following abnormal haemoglobin studies. Carrier status communicated for reproductive planning.
Read from ClinVar at the last evidence sync.
Global and regional evidence disagree on HBB c.380T>G. The global consensus is uncertain significance, drawn from 9 submissions. The regional index asserts pathogenic on 0 observations across a cohort of 2,884. One source places this variant in the clinically actionable band and the other does not, which is the form of disagreement most likely to change a care decision. One record on file carries this variant and has not yet been reassessed.
Composed from the structured fields of the records cited on this page. Requires clinical verification before it informs any decision.
Global · ClinVar
Uncertain significancereviewed by expert panel · Last evaluated 30 Apr 2026
Regional · Regional Evidence Index
Pathogenic0 observations in 2,884 · updated 12 May 2026
Human review required
VUS globally, Pathogenic regionally. A clinician weighs both; neither source is treated as correct.
Global
Read from ClinVar, which aggregates submissions dominated by European-ancestry cohorts.
Regional
Modelled regional aggregation maintained inside this workspace.
VariantPulse analysis
One source places this variant in the clinically actionable band and the other does not. Global submitters downgraded this change to uncertain significance in April 2026. The regional index still carries the earlier pathogenic reading from haemoglobinopathy work-ups. Beta-thalassaemia carrier status is common in the UAE and drives premarital and reproductive counselling, so a disagreement here has direct family-planning consequences and must be resolved by a clinician, not by the software.
VariantPulse recommends manual review due to conflicting interpretation across evidence sources. It does not rank one source above the other.
HBB c.380T>G. The DNA is unchanged. The evidence around it is not.